Yup. But there are ways to get the old look back.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/classicthemerestorer/
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/cstbb/
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/classicthemerestorer/
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/cstbb/
I'd read about 29 on The Register, but this thread prompted me to run the update on a laptop that was on 28, but with a slightly different profile from my other computers. It looked okay with Classic Theme Restorer, but after a restart with the addition of cstbb it lost my bookmarks toolbar and would not restore it. Some commands required a second click to activate. IOW borked. Even before it went pear shaped, it had extra wasted space above and below the address bar. Vertical space is critical in this age of widescreens.
I've installed FF ESR and it picked up the profile from the 29 install, which I did not remove. It appears to have installed over the 29 install, despite changing the ESR install location to \Mozilla\Firefox ESR\.
Does anyone know if you can move a FF profile to Pale Moon? I noticed Pale Moon has a version optomized for Atom cpus. I'll be trying it on an Atom desktop.
Mozilla appears to have seen the growing market share of Chrome and blinked. I tried Chrome long ago and hated it, but I have FF highly customized to operate the way I want. I'm very frustrated with developers mucking around with the interfaces for no good reason (Unity, Win 8, etc.) instead of fixing the core operating problems. In the case of FF, it has memory problems again. Back at FF 3.xx or 4.xx it could handle about twice as many open tabs as it can currently.
I've installed FF ESR and it picked up the profile from the 29 install, which I did not remove. It appears to have installed over the 29 install, despite changing the ESR install location to \Mozilla\Firefox ESR\.
Does anyone know if you can move a FF profile to Pale Moon? I noticed Pale Moon has a version optomized for Atom cpus. I'll be trying it on an Atom desktop.
Mozilla appears to have seen the growing market share of Chrome and blinked. I tried Chrome long ago and hated it, but I have FF highly customized to operate the way I want. I'm very frustrated with developers mucking around with the interfaces for no good reason (Unity, Win 8, etc.) instead of fixing the core operating problems. In the case of FF, it has memory problems again. Back at FF 3.xx or 4.xx it could handle about twice as many open tabs as it can currently.
Last edited:
Next time, you might want to test out your addons, etc on the portable version of FF. You can just extract/install it to your desktop.
http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable
You can copy and paste your profile into \(PortableFF)\Data\profile folder.
http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable
You can copy and paste your profile into \(PortableFF)\Data\profile folder.
After longtime waiting Firefox introduce best version for the user included all of them Plugin, that help to the developer community check out each and every things. I feel it's not for expert help all the user whose want to use internet with fast speed browsing. Before is that lots of issue are coming like low speed handing problems and many more.
I may be misunderstanding what you're saying but, if you mean test everything first, there are close to 12,000 plug-ins/add-ons/extensions for Firefox. Trying to thoroughly testing all of them individually, and then along with each and every other one would take, I don't know, maybe decades. 
Last edited:
About Us
About Us
Contact Us
Contact Us
Hardware Support Forum
