Geforce 4 MX440 - Is it worth it?
Home | Reviews and Features | Special Reports | Forums |

Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Geforce 4 MX440 - Is it worth it?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    648

    Geforce 4 MX440 - Is it worth it?

    I'm not a hardcore gamer, but i do like to play the most recent games. I have heard that this won't keep up with the games that are going to come out soon. Whats your views on it?
    Its got a great price, and i'm pretty strapped for cash at the moment. Is it worth it? Or should i get a GF3Ti200 instead a while later?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    73
    Hi,

    I faced the same dilema a few weeks ago, and decided to buy the geforce3 ti200 , at the time I didnt know about the Geforce4 Ti4200 that will cost less than US$200,00 . Now you can get a G3 Ti200 for 110,00 and it has DX8 support. I would save a little more and buy a G3 Ti200 and overclock it or even a G4 TI4200 if your budget allows. I'm not a hardcore FPS gamer but I do like to play MOAHH and Op. Flashpoint at 1024x768 32bit, and the GF3 performs great. Hope it helps.

    Unax


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    648
    Yeah i'm the same, i love Op Flash and Allied Assault, so that might push me into spending a little more than i wanted.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Location
    Grand Haven, Michigan, USA
    Posts
    11,332
    What do you have now. Even something liek a GeForce2 GTS is good enough for most. If your running some crappy integrated graphics then a GeForce2 GTS-V costs less then %50 at NewEgg.com. The GeForce3 Ti200 has more features and does run faster (it also overclocks nicely). The GeForce4 MX is basically a Geforce2 MX that runs much faster. It likely performs about the same as the GeForce2 GTS.

    The GeForce4 Ti4200 are starting to show-up on pricewatch slowly. One place is listing an ETA of this Thursday (5-2-02), but most are showing about 2-3 weeks still. I plan on getting the Ti4200 64MB version. The memory runs faster and it is showing up for $169 already.

    ------------------
    AthlonXP 1600+ 1.65v 42'C
    FOP32-1 Mod w/80mm 30db
    Epox 8KHA+ KT266A
    256MB Crucial DDR266 cas2
    GeForce2 GTS (210/410)
    Sound Blaster Audigy
    Antec SX-630 Case (mod'd)
    TTGI TT-350-SS 370w PS
    AMD Phenom II x4 945 3Ghz | ASUS M4A77TD | 2X WD 1TB SATA 2 hard drive | 2x2GB Corsair XMS3 | nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS | ATI TV Wonder Theater Pro 550 | Antec P-160 case | Antec 650w Earth Watts | LG Blu-ray Super Drive | LG DVD RW | Windows 7 Pro

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    648
    I had a Geforce2 Pro from Leadtek. I had to return it under warranty, and i asked if i could get a geforce 4 MX440 in place of the GF2 Pro being returned to me, and pay the difference. But now i've been told i'll get the MX440 for free if they find the card i sent them is faulty. I didn't want to press my luck and i'll take any card thats free!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    San Diego, CA, USA
    Posts
    440
    I repeat ..do not get the g4mx440. it is severely crippled. Even Carmack acknowledges it.
    Get busy Living or get busy Dying - Tim Robbins, Shawshank Redemption

    When you understand the root, you understand all of its blossoming - Bruce Lee

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    1,070
    I went from a GeForce2MX to a GeForce4MX 440 and there was just about no difference at all. It's not worth the money, I would go with something like the GF4Ti4200 or maybe the GF3Ti200 or something like that. Big speed difference in my opinion.

    Good luck!

    ------------------
    XP1800+
    Thermaltake Volcano 6cu+
    Soyo SY-K7V Dragon+
    2Maxtor 20GB HDD (RAID 0)
    256MB PC2100 DDR RAM
    Verto GeForce4 Ti4600
    Sony 52x CD
    Pioneer 16x DVD
    Acer 20x CD-RW
    DFI LANparty UT-DR SLi
    Athlon64 3000+ @2.5Ghz(Venice)
    2GB Mushkin PC3200
    Twin PNY 7900GTX's SLi
    Audigy 2/Logitech Z560's
    21" Gateway Widescreen LCD
    22" Gateway Widescreen LCD

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    us
    Posts
    1,411
    why go gf3ti200 when u can get a 8500 for really close to the same price. it is faster than a ti500 in most situations and can support dual monitors. i like mine alot.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    San Diego, CA, USA
    Posts
    440
    but it doesnt' come close to the awaited 4200 ...but then again .i'll have to check out the 2D quality on the GF4Ti4xxx (not MX)
    Get busy Living or get busy Dying - Tim Robbins, Shawshank Redemption

    When you understand the root, you understand all of its blossoming - Bruce Lee

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    8,466
    Originally posted by Leeren:
    I repeat ..do not get the g4mx440. it is severely crippled. Even Carmack acknowledges it.
    That is irrelevant. It is still a good card if you can get it at a decent price. Very ignorant to write it off like that.

    IMO, a 7500 might be a better buy in that price range. The step up to a DX8 card (e.g GF3, Radeon 8500, GF4) would definitely worth the extra cost, though. The shader programmability of DX8 cards will also help them run DX9 games better than DX7 cards run DX8 games.

    The development platform for DX9 is the Radeon 8500 (R200). Many DX9 functions will be partially hardware accelerated. This is in contrast to DX8 operations on DX7 cards, which usually must done in software (retarded!).

    MuFu.

    ------------------
    XP@(11x152MHz)
    Kula Masta HHC-001@7V
    KG7R
    Krewtial 512MB
    Raydion 8500LE@315/640MHz
    60GXP 60GB
    75GXP 30GB
    SBLyve! 5.1
    PlecksRyta 16/10/40A
    Pie-on-ear 16x DVD
    LG Phlatron 795FT+
    WyndoesXP

    [This message has been edited by Mutha Funker (edited 05-02-2002).]
    Opteron 144@2.8GHz (stock HS/fan), Asus A8N-SLI SE (passive NB), 1.5GB RAM (2:3:2:5, 2T), WD Raptor 740GD 74GB, Maxtor DM10 300GB, Asus EN7600GT SILENT@???, M-Audio Revo 7.1, Nebula DigiTV, Dell 2005FPW, Enermax 431W Active.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL, US
    Posts
    351
    Hey guys. I just got a new laptop, with a GeForce 440MX. It is the toshiba 5005-s507. Compaired to my Geforce3 in my desktop, it is slow, but I can run every current game with max detail, and at 1024x768 without so much as a hicup in framerate. For the price, it is a good chip, but you should prolly look into something like a GF3 Ti500 because they are about the same price, if you shop around.


    ------------------

    -Pikachu
    ICQ: 19553058
    -Pikachu
    ICQ: 19553058
    PIV 2.8 @3.4
    MSI 850E-Max
    4x120gb 7200rpm HDD 8meg cache(Raid 0)
    1x100gb 7200rpm HDD (USB 2.0)
    48/25/48A PlexWriter
    16x Pioneer DVD-Rom
    VisionTek GeForce 4 ti4600
    512mb PC1066 RD-Ram
    SoundBlaster Audigy
    21" Sony E500 monitor
    Windows XP Professional

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •