July 3rd, 2001, 05:53 PM
PCI vs AGP 4x performance - realistically
Considering the T&L engine's massive bandwidth requirements, is there really any performance difference between AGP and PCI when i'm doing just 800x600 at 32bit?
I have a P3 600E, 320 mb RAM;
ATI Rage Fury AGP2x (not pro)
ATI Radeon 32 mb SDRAM PCI
Will I notice changes in that? I'm buying something today!
July 3rd, 2001, 06:16 PM
Get the AGP, you are "ensuring" your investment.
But realistically, nowdays with video cards with so much RAM on them will not make real use of the AGP bus, offering almost the same performance as PCI, since most of the tasks are made inside the card itself.
But still, AGP is better.
Considering your two options, i guess the Radeon PCI will kick the agp fury's a$$.
My advice, get a Radeon AGP
Keyboard not detected, press F1 to continue...
If you were in a world full of crazy people, who would be the crazy person?
July 3rd, 2001, 06:25 PM
Ah... i see. Thanks. Actually, i'm looking for PCI cards because i've read about ATI's new trueform technology that fully optimizes DX8, so i'll get a new PCI card and later this new AGP card. I hope to get dual display running this way.
July 3rd, 2001, 11:55 PM
It's kind a wise decision, since the PCI ATI cards are said the easiest to setup and the most stable for dual-display. I have an ATI 3D Charger PCI I will use as a dual-monitor as soon as I get a new monitor.
Pentium II 350 MHz
160mb NEC PC100 SDRAM
Voodoo3 3000 AGP
Guillemot MaxiSound Fortissimo
Core i7 2600K @ 4GHz | Noctua NH-D15S | ASUS Maximus IV GENE-Z | 16GB G.Skill Ripjaws X 1600 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 670 OC 2GB | 256GB Crucial m4 | 2TB WD Green | Samsung DVD±RW | Seasonic X 460w Fanless | Fractal Design Define Mini | Windows 7 Ultimate | Dell 2209WA @ 75Hz
Join the HwC Folding@Home team!
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)