Who the hell said that P4 systems hold the 3DMark2001 record. - Page 2
Home | Reviews and Features | Special Reports | Forums |

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 68

Thread: Who the hell said that P4 systems hold the 3DMark2001 record.

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Posts
    3,425
    I'm sorry man, the score I posted above are for 640x480x16 settings. BUT, that is even better because the lower the res, the more it shows off what the CPU can do, NOT the video card. I would actually consider this the REAL way to test your CPU on 3DMark2001.

    [This message has been edited by LaoChe (edited 06-23-2001).]

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 1999
    Location
    Austin, TX USA (currently in Bosnia)
    Posts
    4,647
    The topic of the thread is "Who the hell said that P4 systems hold the 3DMark2001 record."

    The TOP 5 SCORES are all P4s.

    P4s hold all of the TOP 5 records.

    Any questions?


  3. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Hell ( :-))
    Posts
    641
    Well the point was that the Palomino is going to kick *** and it will But for the lower res scores he have to hold on

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Hell ( :-))
    Posts
    641
    Originally posted by LaoChe:
    I'm sorry man, the score I posted above are for 640x480x16 settings. BUT, that is even better because the lower the res, the more it shows off what the CPU can do, NOT the video card. I would actually consider this the REAL way to test your CPU on 3DMark2001.

    [This message has been edited by LaoChe (edited 06-23-2001).]

    Oh yes it is the thing is that AMD is going to have an Palomino that is running at 1.5Ghz on sale one month form now and intel is not going to have the P4 2.3Ghz one moth form now hahahahahahahah

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 1999
    Location
    Austin, TX USA (currently in Bosnia)
    Posts
    4,647
    Hahahaha all you want, but your thread title holds no water.

    P4 systems do in FACT hold the "3DMark2001 record".

    Sorry.

    You can hope that the Palimino changes things, but for now you shouldn't make such completely unsubstantiated and easily disproved claims; you're wrong.


  6. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    Zagreb,Croatia
    Posts
    1,824
    Originally posted by NAGD:
    So what my friend here is saying is that the 30% OCed GF3 and it's pure higher clocked T&L is the main reason that the P4 has that 1400Mark ....
    Nope I am saying that people with thoes high scores have some problems .

    For members who think that 3DMARK is reputable benchmark (@ any resolution) I would suggest them to find some CAD benchmarks and then to test power of Intel and AMD systems.

    P4 and Athlon are very different CPUs and they make very diffrent systems, and it is hard to say who is better, but for me answer is obvious. AMD with Athlon core is better CPU.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 1999
    Location
    Austin, TX USA (currently in Bosnia)
    Posts
    4,647
    The only truly good benchmark is the one which IS, (or most closely represents) the program that a user wants the most performance for.


  8. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Hell ( :-))
    Posts
    641
    Originally posted by Baloneyflaps:
    Hahahaha all you want, but your thread title holds no water.

    P4 systems do in FACT hold the "3DMark2001 record".

    Sorry.

    You can hope that the Palimino changes things, but for now you shouldn't make such completely unsubstantiated and easily disproved claims; you're wrong.

    Funk the title feel the speed


    Originally posted by miha76:
    Nope I am saying that people with thoes high scores have some problems .

    For members who think that 3DMARK is reputable benchmark (@ any resolution) I would suggest them to find some CAD benchmarks and then to test power of Intel and AMD systems.

    P4 and Athlon are very different CPUs and they make very diffrent systems, and it is hard to say who is better, but for me answer is obvious. AMD with Athlon core is better CPU.

    Yo might say that but that leads me to my conclusion

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Hell ( :-))
    Posts
    641
    The wholle Point here is to say that Intel and it's P4 sucks

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 1999
    Location
    Austin, TX USA (currently in Bosnia)
    Posts
    4,647
    Originally posted by NAGD:
    The wholle Point here is to say that Intel and it's P4 sucks
    If that was the point (and I'm quite sure it was), then you very much failed in your endeavor.

    You'd be better served to try a different approach, because this one certainly falls squarely on it's face- as has been repeatedly and clearly shown.

    This thread was a very poor and uninformed attempt to make your intended point.

    If you want to tout the Athlon, then throw out some 3DSMAX benches... or something that the Athlon exceeds at; don't hobble your own arguments with contradictory benchmarks!





    [This message has been edited by Baloneyflaps (edited 06-23-2001).]

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Hell ( :-))
    Posts
    641
    Nop I have not Why??? When will you be able to get the 2.3Ghz P4???? And when will I be able to ge the 1.5Ghz Palomino both in stock clock ahahahhahah again

    [This message has been edited by NAGD (edited 06-23-2001).]

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 1999
    Location
    Austin, TX USA (currently in Bosnia)
    Posts
    4,647
    Oh, OK... I see now.

    You're right.

    Athlons DO hold the 3DMark2001 record.

    I apologize for my lack of understanding that Athlons do presently hold the 3DMark2001 record.

    How could I have missed that?

    I'm so ashamed.




    Oops.


  13. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Hell ( :-))
    Posts
    641
    Nop thats not it The point is that Intel and It's P4 sucks

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 1999
    Location
    Austin, TX USA (currently in Bosnia)
    Posts
    4,647
    Oh, I see.

    Your thread here about 3DMark2001 does a great job at showing how Intel and it's P4 sucks.

    Job well done.

    AMD would be proud, I'm sure.



  15. #30
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,176
    This thread is so funny

    NAGD

    Youve heard the saying that goes along the lines of sticking to yours guns?

    Well at least have the gun pointing the right way!




    ------------------
    P3 800e @ 1088 with water cooling
    BF6 Mobo
    Asus 8200 GF3
    256M HSDRAM
    Santa Cruz
    Iiyama Pro450
    Xp1800
    Soltek DRV5
    Corsair PC2700 cas2
    GF4 Ti4400
    Santa Cruz
    Barracuda IV
    Hollywood+
    Iiyama Pro450

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •