February 2nd, 2001, 09:48 PM
Geforse 256 SDR vs Geforse MX HHHEEELP!!!
HEEELLLLPPPP!!!! Am going to buy a vcard tomorrow, need help to decide.
On some hardware review sites, Geforse 256 SDR was a bit faster than MX, but on others, MX was faster. The difference was only 2-4fps though.
The thing is, the benchmarks were done using Queke 3, which does not support T&L (I might be wrong)
On nvidia.com, it says that 256 has T&L engine, while MX has 2nd generation T&L engine. Is there a difference between those two engines?
Also, 256 consumes 16W, while MX consumes only 4W. If I have a 250W supply, is it any concern to me which card I get?
So which card would be faster if I play a T&L supporting game? Like No One lives forever, for example.
And which card should I get, keepimg in mind that Geforse 256 is 99$ CND, while MX is
February 2nd, 2001, 09:50 PM
go for the geforce 2 mx it runs alot cooler, the performance is a little bit better then the sdr, and it is more compatible
duron 800@900 - asus a7v - 640mb pc133 - radeon 8500le 128mb - sb live - 16x dvd-rom - 48x24x48 burner
February 2nd, 2001, 10:19 PM
Get the Geforce MX. It will offer better gaming performance in 16 and 32bit color. They really are great video cards, you get good performance for a cheap price.
February 2nd, 2001, 11:00 PM
I'll most likely get MX, If I can get enough money hehe
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)