Home | Reviews and Features | Special Reports | Forums |

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Home Sweet Home
    Posts
    687

    Beating a Dead Horse

    I want to go over the Windows Swap File (one more time). I'm now running Windows 7 64 bit, with 24GB of RAM. I run a memory usage app, and it consistantly shows I never really use even HALF of my physical memory. Yet, everything I can find says to leave the page file anywhere from 1 to 3 times system memory. So far I've left Windows to do it, and it keeps it at 25GB. Why?? What about the option of making 10-12GB into a RAM drive, and putting the swap file on it? No, I'm not having performance issues, I'm just curious and I can never leave well enough alone.
    There's no place like 127.0.0.1

    "Secular nations have one thing in common-mass graves, and the reason is that they believe the government is the final arbiter of right and wrong and good and evil." -Rob Schenk

    "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on the objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." -James Madison

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Montreal, Que, Canada
    Posts
    8,634
    Don't reserve 12GB of ram for the swap is bad ram use. Why don't you make the swap a variable size 1GB to 24GB, your swap will never get increase over that minimum 1GB size. Leave the swap on the hard-drive, setting-it in ram won't improve your computer speed anyway.
    Gilles Lussier

    HWC Folding@Home Team

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Dallas, Tx.
    Posts
    2,633
    I have 8 gigs of ram on my Win 7 machine and very seldom use half of it

    Now a days the swap file is "set it and forget it."

    Years ago I set my swap file to a ram drive. Sure seemed to go faster...but after the second time I had a system crash that was really ugly - I quit doing it... I also used to set my IE temp files to go to a ram drive... It too was faster... Then I switched to FF and could surf even faster

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    182
    Doc

    ____________http://www.microsoft.com/security____________
    \____________________ ____.-.____ ____________________/
    \_____________\ -._)!(_.- /_____________/
    \_______\. ~\ /~ ./_______/
    \_______/

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Montreal, Que, Canada
    Posts
    8,634
    Because I have large ssd's now, (Intel 520 480GB), I stopped playing with the swap file. But, When I had those Intel 80GB G2 drives, I used a low value for the swap minimum size.
    Gilles Lussier

    HWC Folding@Home Team

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Posts
    26,917
    Article/link,
    Personally,
    I would not bother with the 1.5x - 3x physical memory idea with specs of your system.
    I just let Windows deal Win 7 systems with large amount of memory.
    "I know nothing."
    Cheers.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    5,781
    Don't you guys miss the 640k barrier??
    ASUS Rampage III Formula Intel X58, Intel Core i7-930 @ 3.6, Patriot Viper II Sector 7 Edition 12GB, Galaxy Geforce GTX 680 SLI, LITE-ON Internal Blu-ray Burner 12X, Dell UltraSharp U2711 IPS-Panel Black 27" 6ms, Corsair Hydro Series H100, ENERMAX SGALAXY EVO EGX1250EWT, Corsair Obsidian 800D, Windows 7 x64

    Alienware X-51, Core i3@3.3, 4 gb 1333, 1 TB WD, Evga Geforce 650ti

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Montreal, Que, Canada
    Posts
    8,634
    Well, 640KB seemed huge when I had my first trs80 model 1 computer, with it's own 48KB limit.
    Gilles Lussier

    HWC Folding@Home Team

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts