3dmark score
Home | Reviews and Features | Special Reports | Forums |

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: 3dmark score

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    8

    3dmark score

    what kind of score sohuld i be getting on 3dmark with a radeon 9800xt?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Manchester, England, UK
    Posts
    2,560
    It would help if you could post other specs, such as your CPU/chipset, but I've seen 3DMark2001 scores of about 16-19k, and about 5,000 in 3DMark03.
    Desktop - XP2100 @ 2.4GHz, Abit NF7-S, 1gb DDR500 Crucial Ballistix, 120 + 160gb HDD, Windows XP
    Laptop - Athlon 64 3000, 1gb RAM, 40gb HDD, Radeon Mobility 200, Windows Vista
    Server - P4 1.8GHz, 768mb RAM, 2x 40gb HDDs, Win2k3 Server

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Manchester UK
    Posts
    1,905
    I'd say more like 6k in 3dmark03.
    And the cpu should make too much difference to the 03 score due to it5 being much more graphics influenced, unlike 3dmark01 which is more all round system tester
    A64 3000+ at 3.2ghz
    1gb OCZ Plat 2
    DFI NF4 Ultra-D
    Galaxy 7800GTX
    600W Enermax
    Regassed prommie with R507a

    Ah the new updatedness of my sig.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Manchester, England, UK
    Posts
    2,560
    Yes, sorry, 6,000 3DMarks is to be expected easily.
    Desktop - XP2100 @ 2.4GHz, Abit NF7-S, 1gb DDR500 Crucial Ballistix, 120 + 160gb HDD, Windows XP
    Laptop - Athlon 64 3000, 1gb RAM, 40gb HDD, Radeon Mobility 200, Windows Vista
    Server - P4 1.8GHz, 768mb RAM, 2x 40gb HDDs, Win2k3 Server

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Manchester UK
    Posts
    1,905
    Apology accepted
    A64 3000+ at 3.2ghz
    1gb OCZ Plat 2
    DFI NF4 Ultra-D
    Galaxy 7800GTX
    600W Enermax
    Regassed prommie with R507a

    Ah the new updatedness of my sig.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,230
    Well, last I checked I was getting a bit over 20k on a K8 3200+ in 3DMark 2001 SE. That was without any special optimizations, though (e.g., no dragging the quality sliders down, or reducing the refresh rate, or such), and with CL 3 RAM.

    Edit: also with "overdrive" disabled. And generally nothing's overclocked or otherwise running out of spec in this computer.

    Haven't tried 2003, so no idea there. Guess I could download it, if anyone is really that curious.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    8
    i am getting around 5300-5400 in 3dmark03

    AMD 64 bit 3200
    MSI K8T Neo mobo
    1gb corsair ram
    radeon 9800xt
    audigy 2 zs platnium
    plexwriter 52x36x52

    1 problem im haveing is in the vid settings, smartgart, i cant set to 8x agp. anyone have any ideas on that?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    349
    hmmm thats cant be right then...

    i have a far less system and getting 6,000

    Athlon 1700xp @ 2 gigz
    512mb @ 333
    9800 pro @ 411/360

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Atlanta, Ga
    Posts
    369
    I get 6424 with the system in my sig...
    AMD Opteron 146 @ 2907MHz
    Abit AN8 NF4 Mobo
    XFX 7800GTX (486\1400)
    2 GB CORSAIR XMS PC3200
    2x 160 gig WD (sata raid-0)
    Zalman CNPS9500 Heatsink
    Antec Super LanBoy Case
    Antec 550w TruePowerII
    ViewSonic 19" LCD Widescreen

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Scotland, UK
    Posts
    6,506
    i get 4347 in 3dMark03 with the system in my sig.
    Gigabyte Z87M-D3H l Pentium DC 3.2GHz l 16GB Ram l 64GB OCZ SSD l Radeon 7750 OC Edition l Windows 7 Ultimate X64
    Dell OptiPlex 745 l Intel C2D E6600 2.4GHz l 4GB Ram l 64GB OCZ SSD l Windows 7 Ultimate X64
    Lenovo ThinkPad T61 l C2D T7700 2.4GHz l 8GB Ram l 60GB Kingston SSD l Windows 7 Ultimate X64

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    1,595
    Originally posted by MarBaS
    hmmm thats cant be right then...

    i have a far less system and getting 6,000

    Athlon 1700xp @ 2 gigz
    512mb @ 333
    9800 pro @ 411/360
    It's probably accurate. Don't forget that 03' is 95% vdeocard and your 9800pro is overclocked.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Redmond, WA
    Posts
    1,206
    Originally posted by phenix
    It's probably accurate. Don't forget that 03' is 95% vdeocard and your 9800pro is overclocked.
    I disagree... a stock 9800XT runs at 412/365 and MarBaS's 9800P is at 411/360. In other words, he's getting much better scores with a slower proc, slower memory with half as much, and a slower graphics card. Heck, I even get nearly 5400 with my 9800P at 405/351 with crappy SDRAM and a 2100+. Something's gotta be wrong. I'd guess that its a driver problem.

    MarBaS, how's Redline working for ya?
    Opteron 165 @ 280x9 = 2.52GHz
    ASUS A8N32-SLI Deluxe
    BFG 7600GT OC
    Corsair 2GB DDR400 Dual Channel
    Seagate Barracuda 200GB SATA
    NEC 3500A 16X DL DVD±RW

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,230
    Well, I just got curious. I got 6465 in 2003, with the default graphics card settings. (High quality mip-maps, high quality textures.)

    Pushing the texture and mipmap quality down, only got the score up to 6632. I fail to see much point in that exercise, but lots of people seem to be doing it for bragging rights anyway. So wth

    The system is: 9800 XT on a K8 3200+ with 512 MB DDR 400 (CL3), VIA chipset, Audigy 2 sound card. Again, nothing is overclocked. Even ATI's own "Overdrive" is off.

    Edit: Hmm... I'll say something's awfully wrong with fishbet's score. Our systems are almost identical, including the same mobo and CPU, except his got twice the RAM and it's probably faster RAM than my el cheapo CL3. Yet mine scores a good 1000 points higher. That's not normal.

    Maybe FSAA is still turned on, or something?
    Last edited by Moraelin v2.0; March 3rd, 2004 at 04:50 PM.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Scotland, UK
    Posts
    6,506
    try putting your ram to CL2.5 or even CL2 and you said nothings overclocked, unless your really against it overclock that card a little and see what happens.

    did you upgrade from say an Nvidia and are still using the same windows instalation? as i noticed a difference after my fresh install after my upgrade from geforce to radeon. i got 10,000 in 3DMark 2001se and then re formated and got 12,000
    Gigabyte Z87M-D3H l Pentium DC 3.2GHz l 16GB Ram l 64GB OCZ SSD l Radeon 7750 OC Edition l Windows 7 Ultimate X64
    Dell OptiPlex 745 l Intel C2D E6600 2.4GHz l 4GB Ram l 64GB OCZ SSD l Windows 7 Ultimate X64
    Lenovo ThinkPad T61 l C2D T7700 2.4GHz l 8GB Ram l 60GB Kingston SSD l Windows 7 Ultimate X64

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    8
    Originally posted by SaulTurnedPaul
    I disagree... a stock 9800XT runs at 412/365 and MarBaS's 9800P is at 411/360. In other words, he's getting much better scores with a slower proc, slower memory with half as much, and a slower graphics card. Heck, I even get nearly 5400 with my 9800P at 405/351 with crappy SDRAM and a 2100+. Something's gotta be wrong. I'd guess that its a driver problem.

    MarBaS, how's Redline working for ya?
    what is your agp setting in the bios? mine is at auto and i cant change it. smartgart says agp is off also

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •