Somthing coming this fall or early spring that is 2X faster than a 9800 PRO?
Home | Reviews and Features | Special Reports | Forums |

Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Somthing coming this fall or early spring that is 2X faster than a 9800 PRO?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    853

    Somthing coming this fall or early spring that is 2X faster than a 9800 PRO?

    Nforce 2 Mobo-oem stock
    Athlon Xp3000-Stock
    768 mgs PC2100 @ 2.5/3/3
    Radeon 9700 PRO/365/342
    Western Digital 8mg cache ATA-133/160G/7200 HD
    Win XP Home SP1
    19" KDS "Extreme Flat"

    Laptop
    Athlon 64 3200+
    512mg Ram
    Mobile Radeon 9600
    80G Hard Drive


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    8,466
    This was something I posted about a couple of months ago but had to remove. Loki/R390/R420 - all the same thing; essentially a very, very fast R3x0-generation part with a few hardware additions to support more advanced shaders and optimise for stencil-based rendering. The original R400 project was canned and the tech carried forward into R500.

    x-bit are always pretty lame as far as this kind of report goes. They invariably just re-hash things that have been made public already on B3D forums or The Inq.

    MuFu.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Winnipeg, Canada
    Posts
    778
    I hope that this is ture, but the read is odd.
    Main
    AMD Athlon 64 3000+ 512 cache
    Asus K8V
    Samsung 1gig (2) 512 ddr400 timings 200mhz 2.5-3-3-5
    Zalman CNPS7000A-ALCU
    Radeon 9800PRO
    Audigy2
    Logitech z640
    Pioneer 107d
    Toshiba dvd 16x40
    BARRACUDA SATA 120GB,300GB
    ENERMAX 450w PSU
    Windows w2k Pro

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    853
    I just cant get my mind around stating "2x" the performance if the core is only tweaked.

    Even if you upped the core to 500mhz and put in DDRII@800mhz with a tweaked core, i cant see it being "2x" as fast.

    40-75% faster yes......but 100+%??



    To my way of thinking this would have to be a major core overhaul.
    Nforce 2 Mobo-oem stock
    Athlon Xp3000-Stock
    768 mgs PC2100 @ 2.5/3/3
    Radeon 9700 PRO/365/342
    Western Digital 8mg cache ATA-133/160G/7200 HD
    Win XP Home SP1
    19" KDS "Extreme Flat"

    Laptop
    Athlon 64 3200+
    512mg Ram
    Mobile Radeon 9600
    80G Hard Drive


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    8,466
    I think that "2x" estimate might actually be a little conservative in some cases. An 8x1 architecture clocked at ~600MHz is not out of the question, IMHO. It could well be an 8x2/16x1 configuration of some kind, although these reports of 110-150 million transistors doesn't really support that idea. Their mindset when it comes to the design of Loki certainly seems to be extremely performance-oriented.

    nVidia are targetting 550-600MHz core for the NV40 (a "true" 8-piper), paired with 700-800MHz (that's 1.4-1.6GHz DDR) memory so expect similar performance leaps from them too.

    x-bit are wrong on the process details - it's a 0.13u part, not 0.15u. I believe they're re-using some physical elements from RV350.

    MuFu.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    1,595
    Extremely unlikely that we see anything this powerful as early as this fall imo. Early spring is another story. That's an entire generation in the life of a videocard.
    Last edited by phenix; June 19th, 2003 at 04:26 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    8,466
    I'm quite certain we will. NV40 launch is at Comdex (Nov) for starters.

    MuFu.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    1,595
    Comdex means squat. I've seen items at comdex 2 years ago that still haven't hit the street. I'll believe it when i see it on the store shelf.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    8,466
    Yah, you're right in that they probably won't be widely available until well into the new year.

    ATi have a interim product coming out in a couple of months anyway - the R360 (Radeon 9900 Pro?).

    MuFu.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    1,595
    Quite sure they'll come out with something anyway. I don't know what i'd do if i wasn't spending $200 three times a year on new videocards.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1999
    Location
    Mooville
    Posts
    1,129
    It could be 200% but ATI better get better drivers. Maybe they have fixed everything now. If so, then cool. But otherwise performance wouldn't matter if the drivers were not that great. Nvidias drivers are still excellent and installing a nvidia card usually doesn't have hastles after. But on second thought, the radeon 9800 does look more attractive than the Nvidia ONLY because the price is 200 dollars less. But when the 5900 Ultra is down to around 300, then cool .


    Jeff
    There are experts in many fields, but one thing is certain. You don't have to be an expert to speculate.. So speculate on!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Independence, MO
    Posts
    8,071
    I've had better results with ATis cards and drivers than I ever did with my GF3. I don't think drivers are an issue anymore with ATi.
    Give what you cannot keep to gain what you cannot lose.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    853
    No real problems that i can attribute to the drivers on my end.
    Nforce 2 Mobo-oem stock
    Athlon Xp3000-Stock
    768 mgs PC2100 @ 2.5/3/3
    Radeon 9700 PRO/365/342
    Western Digital 8mg cache ATA-133/160G/7200 HD
    Win XP Home SP1
    19" KDS "Extreme Flat"

    Laptop
    Athlon 64 3200+
    512mg Ram
    Mobile Radeon 9600
    80G Hard Drive


  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Location
    Grand Haven, Michigan, USA
    Posts
    11,332
    So what is the 390? Is it a cut-down version of the R350 core?

    If they doubled the textures per unit, then they could say 2x as powerfull. This would only be for the fill rate of dual textureed pixels and does not repressent as much in the real world.

    I still want a middle of the road card sometime this year to replace my Geforce4 Ti4200. This card is getting pretty old, but it still sells good in the mid-ranged market. The Radeon 9500Pro, 9600 Pro and GeForceFX 5600 are in the pricerange that I am looking at, but the performance is not that much better than my GeForce4. I want a good jump like when I went from my Geforce2GTS to GeForce4 Ti4200.
    AMD Phenom II x4 945 3Ghz | ASUS M4A77TD | 2X WD 1TB SATA 2 hard drive | 2x2GB Corsair XMS3 | nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS | ATI TV Wonder Theater Pro 550 | Antec P-160 case | Antec 650w Earth Watts | LG Blu-ray Super Drive | LG DVD RW | Windows 7 Pro

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •