I have an old computer that I want to play Counter-Strike on it. It is a Compaq AMD K6-2 475 MHz and without an AGP slot. I am thinking an upgrade to G2 MX400, 32 MB, PCI and hopefully achieves 30 fps at resultion = 1024 in CS. Can someone advise whether the V-card can make it?
Yea my old computer was a k6-2 450mhz with a voodoo3 2000 and I got decent framerates with it, especially when using the WickedGL mini drivers. I remember when I found those things I was so happy because they gave me like 20fps haha. Anyways it's definitely possible to play CS on that machine.
If pro is the opposite of con, what's the opposite of progress?
I have other computers: one with P-II 350 MHz and two with XP1600. They all have a same V-card model intsalled: G2 GTS-V. When playing CS on LAN, I can not tell a difference between them: all are quite good to me.
What bothers me is that MX400 uses SDRAM. I know that is a performance killer for Nvidia cards. Plus I have a concern about PCI bus being slow. I can get the card for $35 + $5 shipping. I am buying it purely for playing CS. My bottom line is no lag whatsoever at 1024, or it goes straight into a garbage can.
I was hoping someone who has a MX400 PCI (or MX200) to give me a feeling how it performs in CS.
my k6-2 450 ran cs pretty good with a tnt2,but i ran at 800x600...so hopefully the mx pci should be adaquate, for most players at least although i might has a few problems at 1028, perhaps a voodoo 3 would be your best bet. they seemed to work better with k6-2s than most cards.
i have a pcchips m598ver7 with a amdk6III+450 @600 and intigrated SIS AGP vid and have only pci slots. i use a gf mx2 400 it has 32meg of ddr so the 400 do use ddr.
i never played that game but i get great FR in Q1,Q2,andQ3, and am a top player online.
the card is a creative annillator2mx
never tried the vodoo but did try a radion AIW worked but used to much proccesing power and had screwy drivers the geforce used little proccesing power well over fifty FPS. in that resolution on Q.
the 21 and 23 were the best for that card over the 29 even the 28 wasnt to bad compared to the 29s.
I reckon that'd be fine. I ran a K6-2 450 with a TNT2, and CS was fine in 800x600 ~ about 30fps what what I'd get.
The MX is a generation above the TNT2, so I reckon you'd be getting 30fps @ 1024x768.
The Voodoo3's are pretty sweet too, as they worked so well with K6-2s. I'd say you'd be up at 30 with a V3 3000. I've currently got a K62 500 with a V3 3500 knocking about, and it'll barely drop below 30fps in CS.
Main PC: A64 3200+ | 1024MB Kingston RAM (Dual Channel) | WD 160GB | Seagate SATA 160GB w/NCQ | Asus A8N-SLi Deluxe | Connect3D ATi X800XL Pci-E | Coolermaster ATC-710 case | Antec NeoPower 480w PSU | Toshiba 27wl46 27" TFT
Yes, the Creative Geforce 2MX uses DDR RAM, but unfortunately that makes it one of the worst Geforce 2MX cards. The Geforce 2MX (orginal) or 2 MX400 support a memory 128bit address bus which means either 128bit SDRAM or 64bit DDR RAM.
As DDR RAM isn't twice as efficient as SDRAM then SDRAM versions of the Geforce 2MX 400's are faster than the DDR version. This is seen in the benchmarks.
The Geforce DDR, 2 GTS 3's, 4Ti (+ some 4MX's) all support 256 bit memory address bus. Hence 128Bit DDR is the best option