Who said Celerons was crappy SETI preformers??

[Duckman]

I first ran the standard setiathome_win_2_04.exe. Before I even finalised the first WU I found out it was too slow (aprox. 17h), so I switched to the commandline, and VOILA!!!! Runs "sligtly" faster now.

http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/s...eam_42082.html

The FrankenCooler's scores:

Pos. 481 since yesterday, WU's at 6h.55min.

Not bad for a Celeron466

Duckman

------------------
Visit my homepage:
Duckman's Wild Page
Site Content: Overclocking, cooling and a lot of BS about Me, Myself and I.
Sorry, I didn't hear you, I was staring at your breasts.

[This message has been edited by Duckman (edited 05-20-2000).]

[SadSadPanda]

I dont know who did?


------------------
Please don't provoke the poor people..........

[Machupo]

[jopey flamebait]i think whoever said it was talking about the crappy celly 2's[/jopey flamebait]

------------------
900 club, anyone? (No relation to that evangelical trash on UPN)

[Hikeon3]

Cellys suck for seti. I get 6:45 a wu and its on 840 mhz. grrr

------------------
Are you suggesting that coconuts migrate?

[This message has been edited by Hikeon3 (edited 05-20-2000).]

[Duckman]

[Even more jopey Flamebait]True Machupo, but remember that the Celeron I is a worse performer than the Celeron II[/Even more jopey Flamebait]


Duckman

------------------
Visit my homepage:
Duckman's Wild Page
Site Content: Overclocking, cooling and a lot of BS about Me, Myself and I.
Sorry, I didn't hear you, I was staring at your breasts.

[DMMD]

Jopey;

OOHHH JOOOPPPPPEEEYYYYY.

This is going to be GOOD

SSHH SSHHHHHHHH

5

4

3

2


...........




------------------
We both know what you are; We're just hagling over the price.

[This message has been edited by DMMD (edited 05-20-2000).]

[warhorse]

My c366@550 takes about 8 hours idle and 9 hours under use. Sure they are crappy performers, but think how much I didn't pay for it.

------------------
www.crosswinds.net/~areyoubored

Updated May 2, 2000

[TNproud2b]

[extreme jopey flamebait] The Celeron2 was a bad idea - much like the Jopecooler® was. Both are sluggish and rather crude. The only thing worse than a Celermine is a Jopecooled® Celermine. [/extreme jopey flamebait]

[DMMD]

[Off the radar screen Jopey Flamebait]Who was it that came up with the name Cellermine, anyways, was it SkySlash?[/Off the radar screen Jopey Flamebait]

------------------
We both know what you are; We're just hagling over the price.

[Hikeon3]

It was the Jopemann. He coined the phrase. But they suck at seti so it dont matter.

------------------
Are you suggesting that coconuts migrate?

[Duckman]

WOOOHOOOO!!!!

Just WAIT 'till jopey see this!!



Duckman

------------------
Visit my homepage:
Duckman's Wild Page
Site Content: Overclocking, cooling and a lot of BS about Me, Myself and I.
Sorry, I didn't hear you, I was staring at your breasts.

[NiteOwl]

so are we going with celemine, Culeron?

[Hikeon3]

No offense was intended for Jopey by saying that.





------------------
Are you suggesting that coconuts migrate?

[saltedeggman]

we should go with Celermine...

salt

------------------
PayPal ROCKS

[Machupo]

you know... i originally proposed Culeron because of the wonderful Spanish translation (***-master). Now that everyone has realized how hopeless this "new" tech is at SETI, can we please just call it for what it is?

------------------
900 club, anyone? (No relation to that evangelical trash on UPN)