This is a quote from one of the articles about overclocking:Obviously they don't know what the hell they are talking about. What the hell is this "Intel chips aren't as good for overclocking, except for the Celeron"?! Have they not heard of the PIII450 and the Coppermine 500&550e. And what is this **** about Celerons having NO L2 cache. I mean are they still using the FIRST Celerons that came out?! These guys should quit giving advise on stuff they know NOTHING about!AMD chips are particularly good for overclocking. Intel chips aren't as good for overclocking, except for the Celeron. This is of great benefit for Quake players. The Celeron has good floating-point performance and can go fast; there's no L2 cache, but Quake doesn't care.
[This message has been edited by LaoChe (edited 03-30-2000).]